hello, my name is:
Marc Hummel. (Philadelphia.) Writer; coffee enthusiast; reader; computer/internet nerd; stationery geek; music fan; literacy advocate.

mystery vanisher:
recent twitters:
recent tunes:- Shearwater – You As You Were
- Shearwater – dread soverign
- Shearwater – Breaking The Yearlings
- Shearwater – Meridian
- Shearwater – Star Of The Age
- Shearwater – Believing Makes It Easy
- Shearwater – Pushing The River
- Shearwater – Run The Banner Down
- Shearwater – Open Your Houses
- Shearwater – Believing Makes It Easy
recent comments:
- Ambivalently Apple | "Long/ Live/ the..." an interweblog by Marc Hummel {Philadelphia, PA} on I Wish Steve Jobs Changed Capitalism, too
- Craig Schlanser on I Think I Have the Right to Grow
- Resolution Check in | "Long/ Live/ the..." an interweblog by Marc Hummel {Philadelphia, PA} on Happy New Year!
- Mom on Drawing: Half House
- Craig Schlanser on Reading on the Web
Category Archives: essays
I Think I Have the Right to Grow
Author Eric Klinenberg has a new book about the rise of living alone in the U.S. and elsewhere. In an interview with the Smithsonian, he highlights some of the research (in Seattle, San Francisco, Denver, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. and Chicago 35-45% of people live alone), and suggests that technology makes it possible, desirable even, to be connected while alone:
The next thing, I would say, is that we live today in a culture of hyperconnection, or overconnection. If we once worried about isolation, today, more and more critics are concerned that we’re overconnected. So in a moment like this, living alone is one way to get a kind of restorative solitude, a solitude that can be productive, because your home can be an oasis from the constant chatter and overwhelming stimulation of the digital urban existence.
I’m wary of suggesting that something like Facebook enables genuine human connection, but I’ll grant that we’re better off with it than without it.
Get the book: Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone {amazon}.
{via andrew sullivan}
On Louis C.K. & Direct-to-web Distribution
I have yet to purchase Louis C.K.’s new direct-to-web performance, Live at the Beacon Theater {official site}, but that won’t stop me from pontificating. (I’m not completely without my C.K. bona fides however; I listened to and enjoyed his “appearances” on WTF and Fresh Air.)
Anyway, as you probably know by now, the comedian decided to release his show direct to fans, bypassing the traditional studio model where they pay for the shooting of the video, have control over the distribution, and eventually send the performer a cut. C.K. simply paid for everything (a $250,000 investment according to the Times), and made it available on his website direct-to-fans for $five.
It’s reminiscent of Radiohead’s web release of In Rainbows {wikipedia} via a pay-what-you-can scheme.
C.K.’s experiment has already been dubbed a success, earning him $750,000 pure profit (again, according to the Times). The temptation here is to make too big a fuss about this, pointing to this new model as the future of the web and entertainment. No one would be giving Louis C.K. five¢ if it weren’t for his appearances on shows produced by established media empires, a point David Carr {NY Times} should be given credit for acknowledging:
In fact, I wouldn’t know anything about Louis C. K. if it weren’t for cable. I DVR’d his freakishly hilarious series “Louie” on FX, which is owned by News Corporation, and I saw his last two comedy specials on cable. The people who helped build the brand of Louis C.K. might wonder about his decision to go native (digitally), but hey, it’s the Internet: it’s every man, woman, producer, consumer, company and cable outfit for itself!
In other words, it’s great work if you can get it. But we’re a far cry from the day when artist an can support themselves on the web by selling their shows directly to fans. But if there has to be a middleman, I suppose one like Etsy or Threadless is a step up from NBC or Viacom.
Reading on the Web
My three main devices for reading are my laptop, my not-iPhone and paper. I’m pretty good at reading on paper, unless not-iPhone is nearby and/or I had too much coffee to drink. Laptop is a pretty crappy reading experience, and the not-iPhone is just a tad too small to enjoy reading for great lengths of time.
I always thought it was my fault. That I’m too easily distracted, not engaged in the subject enough, etc. Or that I’ve been conditioned to think without depth — what Nicholas Carr was saying in The Shallows.
But a few stories making their way around blogland recently has allowed me to pause, relax, and scan the contents of their articles for information.
The first, How Crappy Advertising is Destroying the Web, seems to be about the distracting, ill-placed ads that focus on distracting you from the content you’re allegedly enjoying.
The hopeful second, The Readable Future, envisions a world where publications acknowledge the trend of readers going to third-party services like Instapaper for a good reading experience — a trend publishers can counter by fixing their crappy sites.
The third, Please Let This Not be the Future of Reading on the Web, is a more general call for more reader-centric copy.
I couldn’t agree with this sentiment more. It’s (at least partly) why I avoid sites like the Huffington Post (and to a lesser extent Salon). But at the end of the day, writers and their publishers need to get paid somehow. I worry about the day that obtrusiveness is traded for more blatant paid product placements or similar evil scheme.
Word of the Year
Occupy is linguist Geoff Nunberg’s 2011 word of the year {npr}. In part for its flexibility as a verb, and in part due to Nunberg’s selection criteria, including an “item that shaped the perception of [an] important event.”
An excerpt:
Now, it’s true the protesters weren’t really occupying Wall Street in the old sense, taking it over the way workers in the 1930s occupied a factory or students in the ’60s occupied the dean’s office. This is a new meaning of the verb, for a form of protest adapted to the age of smartphones and Twitter, not to mention REI. Once the new occupy grew capital letters, you could export it to places that had no direct connection to finance, as franchises of the original: Occupy Oakland, like Macy’s San Francisco. They could have just been called protests, but it wouldn’t have felt as much like a movement.
Nice Guys Finish Last
A new study — Do Nice Guys Finish Last, by Jonah Lehrer {wired} posits that agreeable men have less successful careers (measured in U.S. dollars, of course) than their un-nice counterparts.
In a series of follow-up studies, the researchers replicated their results, showing that agreeable men earn less even after controlling for a long list of variables, including other personality traits and the possibility that nice people choose less lucrative professions…
I think my place in this race would depend on who you ask. But I am heartened by the conclusion to Jonah’s article…
Posted in essays, science
Tagged career, jonah lehrer, nice people, sad but true, wired
Leave a comment
What Our Routers Say About Us
I’ve always been intrigued by the social phenomenon of the names people give to their Wi-Fi routers. Right now sitting in my apartment I can see a few notable ones:
- The patriotically Philly “ballz franklin”
- The simple yet informative “blondies”
- The self-loathing yet astute “necessary evil”
- The studious “PSAT”
- The blithely lazy “linksys”
- The misleading — as no such establishment exists within Wi-Fi range — “citywidecafe”
- And the territorial “Sandra’s Network”.
Lauren Collins explores the wild west of wi-fi with a piece about wireless network enthusiast Alexandra Janelli, in The Tao of Wifi {new yorker}. The inspiration for the site came in 2009…
…in a bar on the Lower East Side, [while she was] fiddling with her iPhone. A window popped up asking if she’d like to join a wireless network called Alcoholics Shut In. “[She] was, like, well, that’s really odd… I’m not a huge techie, but I thought to myself, There must be other funny names out there.”
The fruits of her curiosity culminated in this entertaining site, WTFwifi, a compendium of user-submitted Wi-Fi names.
Posted in essays, technology
Tagged internet, new yorker, technology, wi-fi, wireless
Leave a comment
LRC on OWS
I’m not shy about my love for the weekly radio show Left, Right & Center. It’s the Gilligan’s Island of talk radio — that is — there’s a token member of each level of society or in this case, each political persuasion (sort of). There’s the optimistic, if not denialistic (is that a word?) Tom Hanks-look-alike from the political center, Matt Miller. Then there’s your affable, conservative Brit — a combination that never fully sets in the first time you hear it. Then there’s the on-again off-again Arianna Huffington, from the “independent progressive blogosphere,” whatever that means.
Last but not least is Robert Scheer, the outspoken, banks-must-die advocate for the left. Despite the fact that three of those four could be considered on the left (it is California after all…), I appreciate the intellectual rigor present in their conversations.
Then again, maybe the real reason I like the show is the way the other three seem to set it up so perfectly for Scheer in almost every episode. His rant from last weeks’ show is a good example of any of what I’m talking about, and makes such an awesome point about the hypocrisy coming from the media/right/left about the Occupy movement.
Scheer, wrapping up a soliloquy about the police presence in L.A. as Occupiers set up camp near Bank of America, next to the headquarters of Wells Fargo:
I think that the Constitutional guarantee of the right of people to assemble and demand a redress of grievances — if you can’t do that over this kind of issue, it makes the Constitution hollow, it mocks it. And for our government to have celebrated demonstrations that are certainly more disorderly than these, more of an inconvenience to people, in places like Cairo, in China… we said “no, so what if they disrupt traffic in these places, they have the right to assemble,” and now here people are talking about keeping the sidewalks clean, let’s not inconvenience people, I think it’s nonsense.
Nonsense indeed. From last weeks’ episode, Occupied by Occupy {kcrw}.
Posted in essays, media, things i like
Tagged left right and center, podcast, politics
Leave a comment
How Whole Foods Primes You to Shop
This article about Whole Foods primed me to buy this book about tricky marketing and the way we’re manipulated to buy more stuff. I hope to have a longer post with original quotations & thoughts from the book published soon, but for now check out an excerpt from How Whole Foods “Primes” You to Buy {fast company}. It addresses the sight any grocery shopper is familiar with:
Flowers, as everyone knows, are among the freshest, most perishable objects on earth. Which is why fresh flowers are placed right up front–to “prime” us to think of freshness the moment we enter the store. Consider the opposite–what if we entered the store and were greeted with stacks of canned tuna and plastic flowers? Having been primed at the outset, we continue to carry that association, albeit subconsciously, with us as we shop.
He’s Watching You

I’m burning through the Steve Jobs biography. It’s a great read for all the reasons you have probably already heard about.
What’s fascinating about it to me is the missing story it reveals between Steve Jobs the husband, brother and father – and the company and products he helped create.
No CEO has such a personal fingerprint on the products they create. His touch is evident in every Apple product. Take the “home” button on the iPhone, for example — the way it makes that satisfying little “pop” sound when you click it. Likewise the iPad’s rounded edges and the way the screen “thumps” when you tap it. These are the little details you know Steve Jobs himself spent days obsessing over, making sure they felt just right. He is personified in the things we use everyday; he is larger than life.
As CEO and co-founder of the world’s most profitable tech company, you see a man with an intuitive business sense, and an talent to figure out what people want before they know they want it (to paraphrase a famous passage from the book). He generated an enormous amount of wealth, but he lived a simple life and rejected superfluous displays of riches.
What I find most inspiring about the book is finding out what made him tick and how he approached his work and life. He was a genuinely curious, passionate guy, who was often hard to get along with but who seemed to have a good heart deep down somewhere. He made things not for money foremost, but out of passion and the belief that technology could improve human creativity and our lives.
While taking a break from reading the book today I watched a neat documentary with some interviews with him and other folks: One Last Thing {pbs}.
The Philadelphia High Line?
Didn’t know about this project:
The Reading Viaduct soars over the neighborhood just north of Philadelphia’s Center City… Elevated railroad tracks long abandoned and overgrown with vegetation, the Viaduct has many dreaming of a park along the lines of the High Line in New York, one of the biggest urban-renewal successes of the last decade.
Good interview with Philadelphia proponents and one of the original advocates for the NYC High Line {WHYY — Radio Times}.
I think it would be a clear win for the city to turn an abandoned structure into more green space (about 5 acres). It generated a ton of money ($millions) in new investment around the high line in NYC, so the Chinatown folks need to suck it up and get on board.
Posted in essays, things i like
Tagged good ideas, green space, high line, nyc, parks, philly, urban development, wishtheyhadthisinphilly
1 Comment










